Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Faith, Fear, and Superstitions



Indian rituals have long taught us that one must visit their respective holy places, irrespective of caste or creed. Over generations, we have come to believe that every new beginning, marriage, childbirth, or even patient recovery must start with a visit to a religious place.

I still remember the first year of my marriage, there was confusion and conflict over whether we should visit a Temple or Vihar as a newly married couple. I was told that one must first visit their Kuldevata or the family deity where we called it our own God. This line is such a Paradox, have God has created us? or we have created our own Kuldevata ?

 

Every major religion claims that their God created the universe. If that were literally true, the logical outcome should be one God or at least one universal truth. Yet we have thousands of God’s, each tied to geography, caste, community, clan, or family tradition. This only projects these deities has evolved only from human culture, not the other way around.

 

The irony deepens when we look at India’s social history. According to the 2011 Census data on caste categories, a sizeable population historically belonged to communities that were either denied entry into temples or having limited access to it. These same temples are now presented as compulsory gateways to divine blessing.

 

Caught between beliefs and these contradictions, I found myself unsure what was genuinely “right.” Instead of surrendering to old conditioning, I chose to pause & question.

 

Years later, when Kabir (my son) was born with a critical lung condition and his oxygen levels kept crashing, baby went through 6 days of NICU treatment before he was handed over to us.

 

During his last and most critical admission, fear strikes again with similar episode of drop in O2, friends & relatives around us began making navas (vows) and bargains with different God’s, each hoping their chosen deity would intervene. I have no objection with their faith and in fact I feel genuinely glad and deeply grateful to be surrounded by so many people who wished for Kabir’s speedy recovery in their own ways, through prayers, vows, and heartfelt hopes.

 

As parents we were sure, “Kabir will heal with the help of medical science, but I am no longer sure if society will ever heal from its superstitions”

 

Superstitions are tolerable only to the extent that they act like a placebo for the patient, beyond that, they become harmful.

 

It’s not really anyone’s fault. This belief system has been passed down from centuries. We were taught to fear the divine as much as we were taught to respect it. This is nothing but dogma, which conditions us to think that every outcome depends on appeasing God through priests or rituals. And if not a Brahmin, then some other religious intermediary a baba, a mullah, a pastor, a monk.

 

The “priesthood business” is perhaps the oldest in human history. It thrives on people’s vulnerability when someone is sick, when a loved one is on their deathbed, or when life feels uncertain. That’s when faith becomes fear, and belief turns into dependency.

 

The Priesthood Business: Selling Heaven in the Name of Faith

 

Every religion claims to have mastered the mysteries of life and death. They tell us they know where we come from before birth, where we go after death, and what determines whether we achieve Moksha, Nirvana, Parmarthika, Jannat, or Heaven. These are different names, but the business model remains the same.

 

Across traditions, a class of people has positioned itself as the middleman between human fear and divine promise. They convince us that salvation, peace, and even our next birth depends on rituals, offerings, and prayers that only they can perform correctly. And, of course, for a “fee.”

 

This priesthood industry thrives because it exploits two of the deepest human emotions fear and hope. When people are most vulnerable grieving & feeling hopeless.

 

Questioning the Right Way to Pay Homage

 

As I am mentioned in previous blog, what’s the best way to pay homage & I am still unsure what’s the right way to pay homage truly is.

 

When someone close passes away, you are left helpless surrendering to the will of something greater. In that moment, all you can do is offer your respects and say goodbye with the deepest sincerity.

 

Yet the question lingers how should one do it?

 

Through religion, we are taught to believe in life beyond death (in the form of holy soul) and to perform rituals that guide the departed to a transcendental world. But I often wonder are these practices truly for them, or are they simply a way for us to find comfort in believing we have done our best?

 

Knowing that we all began as nothing more than a single zygote, nurtured within our mother’s womb for nine months, transforming into an infant.

 

When we are born, we are being thought that we are product of reincarnation and have carried forward in this life with the baggage of good or bad karma. I simply wonder how the astrologer knows it, how quickly a priest finds the way can clean my bad Karma?

 

Does that mean, my Karma was not settled in my previous life by my loved one?

 

If this tally of Karma is not happening with the rituals, why are we doing it?


14 comments:

  1. God is, in my opinion, Man's most monstrous invention

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don’t have any grounds to dispute your point

      Delete
  2. I think that to improve a society, that society needs to have a deep understanding of psychology. Psychology is a weapon that can bring about revolution or reverse the situation.
    Thank you for adding to the knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I truly believe that these so called people who call themselves messenger of gods (eg.babas) have made a good business out of human emotions. It was a good read.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Partly agree to the blog. Yes, Superstion exists and its people’s dogma that these so called priests/Baba, etc take an advantage of…. But thats one side of it. The other side is, Just because these entities failed to know about God and hence couldn’t Spread the right knowledge, doesnt mean God doesnt exist. The mere reason why we are not allowed to question, is because they dont have answers. But as indviduals, how much have we tried to know God? Or how much have we questioned and tried to find answers on our own? We simply point out the ‘wrong’ coz its convenient. But have we put any effort and tried to search the ‘right’?
    May be, There IS just one God. We simply dont know about him and choose to conveniently decide that He doesnt exist..

    Not everything can be contained within the Scientific boundaries. You must be attached with Kabir, your son. If Science was unable to save him, for all the valid scientific reasons, would you have taken it normally?? NO, your world would have come crashing down…. This is called LOVE. We are not just living beings. We are driven by soul. Being an Atheist takes you to the bridge from where you can see that you have left the baseless Dogma behind. But you now need to cross that bridge and search the Truth. Find a GURU, who can help u… There are lot of people who claim to be Gurus. You need to identify the right one….

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for sharing your perspective, it raises important questions. But a few points need clearer reasoning.

    You’re right that superstition exists partly because people are discouraged from asking questions. On that we agree. But the argument “priests failed to explain God, therefore God still exists” doesn’t hold logically. A claim needs evidence of its own, independent of the failures of intermediaries.
    You ask how much individuals have tried to “know God.” That’s fair, but the same question applies in reverse.

    How much evidence do we have for this God you say “may” exist? Possibility alone isn’t proof. If we are encouraged to question priests, traditions, and rituals, then it’s equally reasonable to question the premise of a divine being.

    About the example of my son. Love for a child is a human emotion. It doesn’t automatically validate supernatural explanations. If science fails in a situation, it means our understanding is incomplete not that a divine cause replaces it. “What if science couldn’t save him?” isn’t evidence for God. it’s a statement about human grief.

    You also mentioned the soul. That might be true, but again, belief isn’t evidence. It’s a hypothesis. We still need reasons or verifiable experiences before accepting it as fact.

    As for “finding a Guru,” that’s exactly where the problem often begins. How do we verify which Guru is genuine? What criteria do we use? History shows that many self-proclaimed guides exploit vulnerability. When personal experience is treated as the sole standard, contradictory traditions all appear valid at the same time, and that prevents us from identifying which claims actually hold up.

    Crossing the “bridge” away from dogma also means not assuming the answer beforehand. Saying “there is one God, we simply don’t know Him yet” is still an assumption. The honest position is we don’t know. And from that point, we examine evidence, logic, and experience not belief inherited from fear or tradition.

    I’m fully open to truth, would love to understand from you or your GURU the basic questions on Karma raised in this blog, but truth must stand even when tested. If a claim is real, questioning should strengthen it, not threaten it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everything what you have written in the blog is already known. Whats different here than the same claims and same issues? Science is eveyrhing, Babas and Priests are taking advantage of people.
      Yes, we already know it. Whats the point of this ‘just another’ blog? These things are already established and known by people. Instead, you should try to move in the other direction. Check the core from where all these claims come, check the Geeta what it says and see if matches the reality and whats going around you. If it tallies, you can buy that concept. I mean, you can go with the closest logical concept. You cant die and see if its all True, right?
      Considered you are right that since there is no evidence, there is no God or Karmas or such concepts and once u die, you realize that you were right…. But, you can be wrong also… and thats the grey area. Study more about it. Coz going this way, writing think kind of hollow blogs wont make
      Any difference. Aise toh, even if God comes in front of you, you will keep aking for evidence…. Define God first, then see where is the dosconnect between the definition and whats being told to us. Thats one way to start….

      Delete
    2. Thanks for taking the time to respond. But a few of your assumptions need a closer look.

      You’re saying “everyone already knows this, so what’s the point?”
      If that were true, people wouldn’t still be spending money on rituals, falling for fraudulent gurus, or being pressured into traditions they don’t believe in. Knowing something and understanding it clearly enough to act on it are very different things. The blog is about examining that gap.

      You suggest checking the Gita and seeing if it matches reality. That’s fine, but the same standard must apply to every religious text, not just the one we’re culturally closest to. A claim isn’t true because a scripture says it; it’s true if it aligns with evidence and logic. Selectively trusting one text is just another version of the belief bias the blog is questioning.

      Your argument about the “grey area” “what if you’re wrong and God exists?” is basically Pascal’s Wager in a new form. But this logic can justify any religion in the world, even mutually contradictory ones. So it doesn’t help us find truth. It only pushes fear-based belief.

      You also say, “Define God first.”
      That’s exactly the problem, every tradition defines God differently. Unless we have a clear, testable definition, the word becomes too vague to analyse. You’re asking for evidence while keeping the claim undefined, that makes honest examination impossible.

      And the idea that “even if God comes in front of you, you’ll still ask for evidence” isn’t the insult you think it is. Asking for evidence is the only way to distinguish reality from imagination, coincidence, or emotional need. If something is true, evidence strengthens it, it doesn’t threaten it.

      You call the blog “hollow,” but simply urging people to “study more” or “trust the Gita” without addressing the core arguments isn’t offering substance either. If anything, it reinforces why these conversations are necessary.

      I’m not rejecting spirituality. I’m rejecting unexamined belief.
      If there is a truth worth finding, it should survive questions not avoid them.

      Delete
  6. The confusion arises when instead of faith we lean into fear. Fear of god or may it be anything.. while faith is all about believing that there are few things in this world we shall never be able to explain and hence we must cultivate the ability to navigate between doing our best with clear intentions and yet be able to surrender to that which we cannot explain. To control what we can and to let go what's beyond our control.
    Faith, religion, superstition & victimhood are all different things... we often confuse one with another.

    Keep writing Rahul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate the encouragement

      You’re absolutely right that faith, religion, superstition, and victimhood aren’t the same The problem is that in practice, they often overlap.

      Thanks again for reading & the push to keep writing.

      Delete

MBA, Gen Z, and the Collapse of Common Sense

At the age of 40, when most people are busy pretending they have life fully figured out, I decided to do something slightly dangerous. I enr...