Across India today, one cannot
escape the growing presence of spiritual leaders in your Insta reels / youtube
shorts. These are popularly known as Baba. They have massive followings, appear
regularly on television, livestream on YouTube, own luxurious ashrams, and
influencing electoral politics. It was once a personal search for spiritual
guidance has now transformed into a multi-billion-rupee ecosystem of faith,
commerce, and soft power.
The modern ‘baba’ is a 21st-century creation part time preacher, part entrepreneur, and part
influencer. It’s an intersection of faith, media, politics, and modern
consumerism. Once confined to the limits of traditional spirituality, contemporary
godmen and godwomen now command mass followings across continents. In a country
where access to mental health care, employment opportunities, and justice can
be scarce, baba’s often step in as informal counsellors, philanthropists, and
community leaders. For many people, faith serves not just as a source of
spiritual comfort, but as a lifeline offering of emotional and social support
in a society.
The worst part is these Spiritual
leaders also wield immense political power. Their
followers, often numbering in the millions, form a reliable vote bank that no
political party can afford to ignore. As a result, many baba’s maintain close
relationships with political elites offering public endorsements, sharing
stages at rallies, and helping electoral campaigns. In turn, politicians extend
support through land grants, legal protection, and policy favours. This
symbiotic relationship blurs the line between spiritual authority and political
influence, turning religion into a powerful instrument of governance and
legitimacy.
Another striking feature of the
modern baba movement is its ability to repackage ancient Hindu philosophy in
the idiom of contemporary life. By fusing yoga, meditation, and moral
discipline with the language of self-help and national pride. This cultural
rebranding of faith transforms religion from a purely ritualistic practice into
a holistic philosophy of success, wellness, and identity.
“When politics, media, and
spirituality intersect, the result is not faith, it’s vote influence.”
However, this rise has not been
without controversy. Several high-profile godmen have faced charges ranging
from fraud to sexual assault to murder. Yet despite scandals, public trust in
such figures persists suggesting a deeper societal need that institutions have
failed to fulfil.
Adding faith in the classroom
Classrooms has never been just
places of learning they are spaces where the future moral compass of a nation
is shaped. Recent revisions to school curriculum reveal how education has
become a tool for cultural assertion and ideological influence. While policymakers
justify these changes as efforts to preserve heritage and generate values.
Critics warn that such reforms may blur the line between education and
propaganda.
In the year 2020 India’s National
Education Policy (NEP) was introduced with the promise of modernizing
the education system encouraging critical thinking, reducing memorising
learning, and promoting holistic development. Its key goals are to combine
“Indian Knowledge Systems” and “ethics-based learning” into the curriculum.
Aiming to reconnect students with indigenous traditions and moral foundations.
This implementation has stirred
controversy. The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT)
India’s apex textbook authority has made a series of content deletions and
revisions in history and social science textbooks. Topics such as Mughal
history, caste-based social struggles (Varnas), and instances
of communal violence have been shortened, rephrased, or entirely omitted. This
selective editing distorts historical understanding.
Cultural and Moral
Reorientation
Parallel to these historical
revisions, subjects like yoga, Sanskrit, Vedic
mathematics (don’t know who got that term), and ancient Indian
sciences have gained greater space in syllabus.
What is promoted today as Vedic
mathematics or ancient Indian science lacks the methodology that defines true
science. The supporters of these ideas often display only selective acceptance
endorsing what modern science seems to validate but dismissing any critique as
blasphemy.
Science is a method for
understanding how things work and why they happen, based on evidence, and it
organizes this knowledge into testable explanations and predictions, but there
is no scope to correct or update religious texts.
Further the inclusion of
faith-based elements in curriculum raises important questions. Should schools
reflect the beliefs of a nation’s dominant religion, or preserve neutrality as
spaces for open and critical inquiry?
Supporter of cultural education
argue that ignoring native traditions leads to moral drift among youth.
However, I feel that faith-driven curriculum risk narrowing the intellectual
horizon as it lacks scientific temperaments, this will encourage reverence over
reasoning.
Independent history
Our freedom fighters had a vision
deeply to shape India as a secular nation, one guided not by religious dogma,
but by the light of rational and scientific temper. Their struggle was not
merely for political independence, but for the liberation of thought and
spirit. They dreamed of a nation where faith would remain a personal
matter, not a tool of governance or social division.
The freedom of a nation lies not only in its borders but in the minds of its children,
what they are taught about
their past determines what they dare to imagine for the future
The Impact on the Young
Generation
What children learn about their
past shapes how they dream of their future. The battles over curriculum are not
merely about teaching methods but also struggles over identity.
Whose history gets told? Whose
faith gets glorified? And who decides what is ‘moral’ knowledge?
One of the most immediate effects
of religious authority influencing education is the reshaping of
identity. When textbooks are written to emphasize religious pride, students
may develop a strong sense of belonging to their community but not nation.
This same pride can easily turn
into exclusion. When history is retold through a single lens be it Hindu,
Muslim, Christian, or nationalist. Students begin to internalize divisions like
us versus them, believer versus non-believer, patriot versus traitor. The
celebration of one identity can become the criticising of another. Thus, while
religion in education can nurture cultural rootedness, it can also sow the
seeds of intolerance when diversity is misrepresented as division. The very
goal of education to broaden minds gets reversed, narrowing the imagination to
a single story of self and society.
Education is meant to awaken
the mind critical thinking & inquiry, not silence it. However, when
religious authority infiltrates the classroom, questioning can be viewed as
rebellion rather than intellectual curiosity. If textbooks present one-sided
narratives and spiritual figures discourage inquiry under the cover of
protecting “faith,” young minds lose the essential skill of critical
engagement. Instead of learning how to think, they are taught what to think.
This subtle shift from inquiry to brainwashing is dangerous. A generation that
cannot question is a generation that cannot innovate. The scientific temper
relies on doubt, debate, and discovery. Yet, in classrooms where myths are
presented as historical truths or where factual reasoning is dismissed as
“western,” young learners are robbed of their intellectual independence. Faith
may offer comfort, but education must offer clarity.
Television & social media fails
to distinguish between genuine insight and manipulated propaganda. The fake
news in spiritual or patriotic language spreads rapidly, deepening existing
biases. The platforms once meant to democratise knowledge have turned into echo
chambers of belief, where noise overpowers nuance.
The real danger isn’t
faith but blind faith, magnified by the social media algorithms.
The question is not whether
religion should be excluded from education altogether, but how it can coexist
with rational inquiry and plural values creating a balance. Faith can
inspire morality, compassion, and service qualities that every society needs.
But when faith dictates what can or cannot be questioned, it undermines the
very spirit of learning.
The goal should be an education
system that respects belief but upholds evidence, that honours heritage but
celebrates diversity, that invites debate rather than silence dissent. When
world increasingly divided by ideology, the youth must be equipped not just
with degrees, but with judgment. They should be taught how to navigate multiple
truths, how to respect faith. Only then can they become citizens of conscience,
capable of bridging the divide between tradition & modernity, spirituality
& science, nation & humanity.
Possible Solutions
Even the best-designed curriculum
will fail without empowered teachers. The success depends on
educators who can navigate complex topics with sensitivity and critical
understanding. Teachers must be equipped with continuous professional
development, exposure to diverse worldviews, and training methods that
encourage dialogue rather than dogma.
An empowered teacher is not
merely an instructor, but a cultivator of thought's
Faith can inspire moral action, it
is vital that religious institutions operate within the framework of
transparency and legality. Laws must ensure public accountability for the
financial dealings and social activities of religious organizations. A society
must hold its spiritual authorities accountable.
Education must move beyond
classrooms into society. Interfaith exchanges, youth forums, and civic projects
can do what textbooks can’t humanize differences. When students meet across
faiths, they replace stereotypes with shared values of compassion, justice, and
coexistence, building empathy essential for a plural democracy.
In the end, the rise of baba
culture getting leak into education reflects a larger struggle over India’s
soul. Spirituality when guided by conscience, can uplift society, but when
fused with politics and teaching, it risks distorting truth and silencing inquiry.
The purpose of education has never been to create believers, but thinkers minds
that question, empathize, and evolve. India’s strength has always been in its
diversity of ideas. To preserve that, our classrooms must remain spaces of
curiosity, not conformity where children learn not what to think, but how to
think, freely and fearlessly.

The article itself is perfect. It asks the right questions and answers, but if we think briefly, just as there was no interruption in the creation of the world after the dinosaurs, so it will be eternal after humans. Humans need only be content to imagine the beginning of a new era, with some effort and what can we say?
ReplyDeleteThank you Sanjay
DeleteGreat article, good balance of both the topics. It conveys perfectly how the mind of youngsters is diverted to a particular direction and to make them think in a certain way.
ReplyDeleteThank you Srushti
ReplyDeleteGreat blog! 👏
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more that education should be kept separate from religion and politics. It's concerning to see how political leaders can influence the education system for their own gain, often prioritizing ideology over facts and critical thinking. To promote a more scientific approach, we need to prioritize evidence-based learning, critical thinking, and media literacy. This means incorporating hands-on experiments, discussions, and debates that encourage students to question and explore.
We also need to ensure that teachers are trained to deliver unbiased, fact-based content and that curriculum development is insulated from political interference.
Thank you so much for your insights
Delete